Eddie Epstein wrote:
Marshall,

Comments below ...

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A small thing to maybe fix:
in examples/descriptors/XCasWriterCasConsumer.xml - there is a definition of
the SourceDocumentInformation element, inline (not "import"ed) that
contains:
<description>URI of document. (For example, file:///MyDirectory/myFile.txt
for a simple file or http://www.research.ibm.com/UIMA/relatedprojects.htm
for content from a web source.)</description>

The web source is a dead link.  This file is a modification of another file
in the main uima examples project.  That project has an import-by-name for
the SourceDocumentInformation type, which, in turn, uses an apache.org
sample descriptor in the same comment
(http://incubator.apache.org/uima/index.html for content from a web source).

Not a show stopper.  If fixing, it might be worth a general look to bring
all the examples that are mods of the UIMA core examples up to date with the
current UIMA core examples.

Will fix web link as suggested.

The bin docs/overview_and_setup.html appear to be generated by docbook, but
there is no source other than this file in SVN, so I guess they're not
generated.  Probably should remove the <meta name="generator"
content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.70.0"> element :-).  The copyright and
pub date are wrong (say February 2007).

The docs are supposed to be using Apache UIMA, not just UIMA, at least for
the first mention in the doc.  See
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html.  The first mention in the
doc is "C++ Overview & Setup" (title).


Will fix.

Need to check RAT report: some files noted there as missing apache license
are not generated.  For instance: Perl.html in scriptators/perl, and same
for python and tcl.

As far as I see, none of the html files in UIMA include the apache license.
That's because they're generated from docbook sources, which *do* contain the license. We should put the license in the original source file.
The aclocal.m4 file has GNU licenses without the special exception.  May
need to upgrade the automake version.

Yes, a newer version of automake fixes this.
Great !
Many thanks!
Eddie

Marshall

Reply via email to