Marshall Schor wrote: > Thilo Goetz wrote: >> Eddie Epstein wrote: >> >>> Let's pick a date for a first release candidate, say August 28, >>> and get different people to take responsibility for various packages >>> to be ready. Then we do a status check on that date to see what >>> goes forward? >>> >> I'm sorry to say that I'll have virtually no time for UIMA >> in September and October. I'm not opposed to this plan, >> but somebody else would have to step forward and do the >> overall release management. >> >> > > Thanks for all your work so far on this, Thilo :-) > > I would like to see a full release go out, and agree with Eddie on his > thoughts for making better progress. > > If no one else steps forward in the by tomorrow (how's that for a > deadline?), I'll volunteer to be the release manager for this cycle.
Well Marshall, I think the job is yours ;-) Thanks for taking the lead on this. > > -Marshall >> --Thilo >> >> >>> Eddie >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Thilo Goetz<twgo...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> we don't seem to be getting any closer to be able to >>>> build the sandbox. I will personally not have much >>>> time for UIMA in the next few coming months. I'm >>>> wondering if we should scale down our ambitious >>>> release plans and just do a core release, like we've >>>> done in the past. The core seems to be in good shape, >>>> and we have people waiting for the performance >>>> improvements we made since the last release. >>>> >>>> Alternatively, we can wait until everything is ready, >>>> but at the rate things are going right now, that could >>>> be a long while. Opinions or alternative suggestions? >>>> >>>> --Thilo >>>> >>>> >> >>
