Marshall Schor wrote: > > Adam Lally wrote: >>> Same issue with using Iterator<AbstractCas> >>> Two quick fixes: casting: >>> Iterator<AbstractCas> s = (Iterator<AbstractCas>) aCas.getViewIterator(); >>> and >>> Iterator<? super CAS> s = aCas.getViewIterator(); >>> >>> >> Right.. I think it needs to be like this: >> >> <T extends Iterator<? super CAS>> T getViewIterator() >> > > I tried this, and get for : > Iterator<CAS> s = aCas.getViewIterator(); > the message: Bound mismatch: The generic method getViewIterator() of > type CAS is not applicable for the arguments (). The inferred type CAS > is not a valid substitute for the bounded parameter <T extends > Iterator<? super CAS>> > and no quick fixes. > > I tried some variants, but couldn't get something that worked...
Let's just try to keep it so simple that as a user, I don't need a PhD in generics to figure out what the return type of a method is. --Thilo > > -Marshall >> But I am not sure the usefulness of this is worth the added complexity. >> -Adam >> >> >>
