Adam Lally wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Jörn Kottmann<kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 28, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> >> >>> We could do this for all of our Jars, and I'm thinking this would be a >>> good idea. One reason would be it would align us slightly better with >>> the "maven way" of doing things. When users download jars from maven >>> they would find the sources rather than get maven warning messages that >>> no sources were found, and the m2eclipse plugin would easily be able to >>> get the sources. >>> >> +1 >> >> Yes I would really appreciate having the source code in eclipse linked >> to the uiima jars automatically with mvn eclipse:eclipse. >> >> > > I'm not sure I completely understand - does this mean our binary > distributions contain source, or not? If so, I am uneasy about that. > We had this discussion prior to the last release without a real > consensus being reached: > http://markmail.org/thread/oqredcsn3camvyy7. > No, the "binary" assemblies produced by our builds would not have the sources. What would change is that the maven artificat distribution servers would have, in addition to our Jars, the Sources that go with those Jars.
We still have the approach for people not using Maven, of having separate sources, which can be downloaded (or not), and if downloaded, can be added to the Jars directly. -Marshall > -Adam > > >
