Thilo Goetz wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > >> The reason for a new project was to isolate the classes in the "normal" >> -cp class path to just this one class :-). >> >> This is a general purpose launcher, that could also be used to simplify >> our base launching scripts. >> > > I think we would be doing our users a disservice. I just fixed > the pear runner not to go ahead an use any jar file it finds > in the lib directory. That kind of defaulty behavior has surprising > and undesirable effects. > >
Well, at least this is "optional" in some sense. But other projects I see are using this approach (ActiveMQ for instance). Is there another simple approach to "aggregating" lots of Jar files, other than long lists of them in some file? -Marshall >> -Marshall >> >> Thilo Goetz wrote: >> >>> sc...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Author: schor >>>> Date: Fri Aug 28 19:28:58 2009 >>>> New Revision: 808996 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=808996&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> [UIMA-1536] initial import, moved from uimaj-tools >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-bootstrap/ >>>> >>>> >>> We create a new project just for this? Am I correct >>> in assuming that only UIMA-AS needs this? Why don't >>> we put it there then? >>> >>> --Thilo >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >
