Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip/> > If at some point we wanted to conform better to Maven "standards", we > could rename our artifacts such that the final jar name matched without > using the <finalName> element. (You might be thinking there's still a > "problem" because the final jar name has no "version" info on it, while > the one in the maven repo does. There's a parameter in the dependency > plugin, "stripVersion" which takes care of this.) > > Please post your further insight into this issue, and/or opinions re: if > we should change our artifact names to match our final jar target names. >
Is it even possible to rename the eclipse plugins to match Maven conventions? I seem to recall the maven naming being incompatible with the eclipse plugin naming (for example, they differ on whether to use _ or - as the separator between the artifact name and version number. For the non-eclipse stuff, I guess we could rename them, but it might annoy users who would have to mess with their classpath settings. -Adam
