Jukka Zitting wrote: ... > The LICENSE/NOTICE point that Thilo brought up is a valid one, though > especially when the default build embeds external dependencies to the > build target, it's quite OK to include also their licenses in the > licensing metadata even if those dependencies strictly speaking aren't > being shipped as a part of the source distribution.
You think so? Even with all the "nothing goes into a NOTICE file unless it has to" hubbub? We don't want to create a new maven flame war when we take this release to the IPMC :-) However in that case I guess I would also prefer to have maven fetch the dependencies. Seems wasteful to have them in svn. Not sure how much work it is to change the build, though... --Thilo
