Several sandbox projects have dependencies on xmlbeans (e.g. RegularExpressionAnnotator, SimpleServer, and ConfigurableFeatureExtractor).
The first 2 have obtained xmlbeans from http://xmlbeans.apache.org (as evidenced by their NOTICE). They have copied (some of) the Jar files that come from this into their lib/ directories (xbean.jar, jsr173_1.0_api.jar). The maven repo entry http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xmlbeans/xmlbeans/2.4.0/xmlbeans-2.4.0.pom lists a dependency <dependency> <groupId>stax</groupId> <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId> <version>1.0.1</version> </dependency> In the maven repository, this is listed as an Apache-licensed Jar, and I have read on the web (must be right :-) ) that this is a substitute which could be used instead of the jsr173_1.0_api. If I switch things in the Sandbox to obtain jar parts that are dependencies from the Maven repo system, instead of taking them from our lib/ directories, this change will result in having the above 2 projects get the xbean jar (as before) at version 2.4.0 and the stax_api jar version 1.0.1 instead of the jsr173_1.0_api. Is this OK? -Marshall (who is quite confused by the existence of all these alternative ways of putting parts together...)
