Sorry, it is a false alarm ! After repeating the operations and double checking the Eclipse Extension Sites of my testing Eclipse, I really that there are two copy of uima related plugins in different extension sites.
The distribution builds of the UIMA RC is CORRECT. Sorry, Marshall ! -- Tong On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > > Tong Fin wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Tong Fin wrote: > >> > >>> It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment > >>> "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by > the > >>> Deployment Descriptor Editor. > >>> > >>> > >> I see it in eclipsePlugins directory of my test dir built by unzipping > >> the uimaj binary distribution, and then the uima-as binary distribution > >> (on top of the uimaj base - as is now required). (It is true it is not > >> provided with the base uima bin distribution, but it is provided with > >> the uima-as distribution.) > >> > >> > > OK. Now, I understand why I cannot see it in the base uimaj bin > > distribution's "eclipsePlugins" directory unless I overlay uima-as > > distribution. > > > > I think we should not put DDE in the base uima bin distribution if we > don't > > expect it to work in that way. > > Sounds correct. I looked in the bin distr for base UIMA, in the > eclipsePlugins folder, and don't see the DDE there - but it sounds like > you are seeing it somewhere it shouldn't be. Can you be more speciifc? > > -Marshall > > > It will create a confusion for the end-users > > that only use the base uima bin distribution unless we have a good raison > to > > put there. > > > > -- Tong > > > > >
