On 3/28/2010 12:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get >> this to happen. >> >> Other opinions? >> > From a development point of view Hudson can help us > to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice us, > but usually our build always works. Not sure if it is worth the effort > to get one build broken notification per year. > > The only other advantage I see is that it can automatically publish > snapshot builds, but when this is the motivation to get CI on Hudson > we maybe should start to release more frequently.
I'm in favor of streamlining our build process to release more frequently :-). -Marshall > > Jörn > >
