Hi Thilo, I'm using version 2.2.
-----Original Message----- From: Thilo Goetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 13 September 2007 5:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SIAPI Indexing Hi Scott, what version of UIMA are you referring to? --Thilo Sommer, Scott (Contractor) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking into writing an indexer for the semantic search cas > consumer >>from the UIMA-examples. > > The main reason I want to do this is because our CAS passed to the > indexer does not have a SourceDocumentInformation annotation in our > current set up. I have had a look at the API docs and can see that the > UimaJuruDocument class has 5 different constructors, which basically > shows that most of the arguments are optional (If this is incorrect, > please let me know). I am assuming that in the example, the > SourceDocumentInformation annotation contains information that is > passed to the UimaJuruDocument constructor, but I don't have the > SourceDocumentInformation annotation in the CAS so of course the > SemanticSearchCasIndexer in the example fails. I would love to be able > to simply get the source code for the Indexer and modify it so that it > doesn't require the SourceDocumentInformation annotation, but there is > no source code included in the jar containing this class. > > My only other options would appear to be; to write an Indexer of my > own which does not require the SourceDocumentInformation annotation, > or, to put in a SourceDocumentAnnotation annotation just for the > indexer which contains nothing useful. > > I would like to avoid putting useless annotations into the CAS, so > I've been reading through the SIAPI.pdf and the javadoc. The SIAPI pdf > seems largely focused on the searching with next to nothing about how > to write an indexer. Is there a better source of information on the > SIAPI from an indexing perspective? And overall, is there a better > solution to this problem? > > Cheers, > Scott Sommer. > > > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. > > >
