Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On 10/30/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Thanks Roberto -
>>
>> Upon further investigation - it appears to be a synchronization
>> problem.  I was incorrect in saying that the implementation assumes
>> "that the JCas has been previously initialized for this type (which was
>> not "loadable" when the JCas was initialized earlier)."  There is in
>> fact code to handle this case.  But it appears it may not be threadsafe.
>>
>>     
>
> Oh, threads... World would be a better place without threads :)
> Tell me if I can help you in some way. I can switch to the snapshots
> or build uima's jars from scratch.
>   
OK.  Once we fix this, you can be the first to test it :-)  -Marshall

Reply via email to