Hi,
sounds great, in my project at work we will probably have to unify our
UIMA/Non-UIMA logging in the next few weeks. I will then try to get in touch
(also with Roberto, who already provided a Log4jLogger_impl) to get more more
information about where this overwrite-mechanism for the standard logger from
the factoryConfig.xml would be placed best in the UIMA framework.
Christoph
Michael Baessler schrieb:
Yes, as Frank mentioned below, there is an open task to do. Till now we
hadn't the time to work on this.
I like the idea to have a parameter maybe to directly set the logger
class which is than used in place of the one
that is specified in the factoryConfig.xml file. So it is not necessary
to patch the UIMAFramework class.
If you have some free cycles you can add the missing pieces and submit
them as patch to UIMA-282.
Maybe together we get it into the next release.
-- Michael
Roberto Franchini wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 11:57 AM, Christoph Büscher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
in die mailing list archive I read something about plans to provide a
log4j
wrapper to the UIMA logging mechanism as an alternative to the
standard logger
implementation (Jira: UIMA-282). Are there any plans to include this
in a future
release (we are currently using 2.2.1)?
