Hi,
Depends what your favorite tooling story is. If you prefer
the eclipse tooling, it should go into eclipse. I know
people who would use this kind of functionality if it was
in CVD :-)
And shouldn't the differences be kept as new annotation types so the
viewers don't need to be changed?
Somehow I don't see that. The tooling could be made a lot
nicer if it knows it's displaying differences. And I wouldn't
want to add annotations to my data just for display purposes.
Or maybe I misunderstood?
Mh, not sure. This is probably data that is only used in evaluation
scenarios, so I don't see a big problem with it.
Well, in our first version we now just add new types. Works OK for us
so far. However, its really just a first version...
Katrin
