I've reviewed Fig. 4 and Fig. 3.  Our system seems closer to Fig. 3 (asingle 
Collection Reader (CR) with CasPool size X used to push documents to X 
services).Assuming the "Service Instance" is an aggregate (AG) with multiple 
AEsteps A..D, we are extending Fig. 3 with another level of remote AE forone of 
the steps: Machine0:  Broker + RunRemoteAsyncAE + 2 AG Service 
InstancesMachine1:  RemoteStepB_AE InstanceMachine2:  RemoteStepB_AE Instance 
The AG descriptor is configured with A..D in-line, and the AG 
deploymentdescriptor has a remote 'B' override, possibly with error 
handlingcontrols, etc. CR  --- || --2-- A                              B --- || 
--2-- remote 'B'                               C                               
D (consumer) If I'm following your guidance, we should not use numInstances in 
the AGdeployment descriptor because we have decided to remote 'B'. Instead 
weneed to deploy the 2 AG Service Instances via our own launch mechanism(as 
either multiple -d flags on RunRemoteAsyncAE, or independently intheir own 
processes). Let me know if I'm on track.
- Charles



> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:28:28 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
> [email protected]> Subject: Re: CPE to AS Transition ... Porting 
> processingUnitThreadCount> > Charles,> > Sounds like you are describing the 
> "figure 4" scenario shown on> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/doc-uimaas-what.html> As yet there is no 
> distributed life cycle management facility for services> in the UIMA AS 
> package, so it is up to you to manage the launch of scaled> out service 
> instances.> > The numInstance parameter for a service can be applied to any> 
> "single-threaded" UIMA analysis engine. A primitive UIMA component is> 
> considered single-threaded. A UIMA aggregate by default is deployed by UIMA> 
> AS single threaded, unless async=true is explicitly requested, or async is> 
> implicitly requested by adding UIMA AS properties to one of the delegates> 
> (such as being remote, or replicated, or having error handling).> > For each 
> of the numInstance's, the single-threaded AE will be instantiated> in the 
> same process and the initialize method called. Each instance will> have a JMS 
> listener connected to the same service request queue. Replicating> AE 
> instances in the same process require user code to be thread-safe with> 
> respect to it's shared static or other singleton objects.> > Regards,> Eddie> 
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Charles Proefrock <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>wrote:> > > We've previously run our CPE with a single 
> CollectionReader and 2> > processing units talking to two remote Vinci 
> services. All of the stages> > are relatively quick except for the remotes, 
> so running multiple threads in> > the same jvm on the same processor is 
> sufficient for the CPE host and in> > theory we would want to increase the 
> processingUnitThreadCount to X over> > time. As we transition to the AS 
> architecture, it is clear that the main CPE> > sequence is declared as an 
> aggregate, and that an instance of the aggregate> > is deployed (in the 
> examples, via the -d flag of runRemoteAsyncAE). There> > are also numInstance 
> elements that can be declared in the deploy descriptor,> > but they are 
> qualified as only working for primitives and/or synchronous AEs> > ??> >> > 
> Simply ... if we want to have a single CollectionReader that services X> > 
> pipelines, returning all CASes to the same Listener ... what is the> > 
> deployment approach?> >> > Thanks,> >> > Charles> >> >> >> >> > 
> _________________________________________________________________> > See how 
> Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the> > go.> > 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your 
life.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/

Reply via email to