> No, that is the recommended solution to this issue. I don't > see anything wrong with it.
Well, I thought it was quite hacky. I usually detest 'outsourcing' resource this way. > This is not specific to the CAS, > btw. You always get into these kinds of issues when you try > to modify a collection that you're currently iterating over. > > And you also may want to remove the old T1s from the index > as well, since they'll be replaced by the new T2s. You also > need to do this in a separate step... OK, thanks very much. I did the removal, too, seems cleaner this way. Best, Aleks PS: very sorry for my second mail, but my university forbids outgoing mail to be relayed by outside SMTPs and the UIMA-list initially rejected my mail for address-forgery, so I resent it with my uni-account (but forgot that I did so), without noticing Thilo had already forwarded my question. Just ignore the second mail :-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
