Neither for me. Best, Joachim
Zitat von Tobias Wunner <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > I have just started using ConceptMapper as UIMA component and do not > have any dependencies on public interfaces. No need for ConceptMapper2 > for me. > > Regards, > Toby > > > On Apr 28, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Michael Tanenblatt wrote: > > > It is not clear how many people are using ConceptMapper at this > > point, since it hasn't been officially released yet, but in working > > with some projects that are currently using it, we have found some > > inefficiencies that we'd like to correct. Unfortunately, some of the > > proposed modifications will cause changes to the public interfaces > > (method parameters, returned objects). If we are going to fix these > > problems, we can either just go forward and do it, breaking any code > > that might depend on the current public interfaces, or we could > > preserve ConceptMapper and create a separate new system, a > > ConceptMapper2 with the changes. If ConceptMapper is currently only > > used as a UIMA annotator and changes to the public interfaces will > > not cause anyone problems, I'd personally prefer to just make the > > changes to ConceptMapper and not have a new, second version, > > particularly as it hasn't even been *released* yet. On the other > > hand, I wouldn't want to go breaking anyone's currently working > > systems. > > > > So, are there any comments from anyone currently using ConceptMapper? > > > > Thanks...m > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This mail was sent through http://webmail.uni-jena.de
