How would DITA play into this? It seems to me that whether the community adopts it or not, DITA is a de facto standard for document structure. Further, I clearly see millions of applications for text analytics and DITA.
** ** ** ** Kameron Arthur Cole Senior IT Specialist, Managing Consultant IBM Information Management Lab Services. [email protected] home office: 305-831-4058 / mobile office: 305.905.4112 / fax: 845.491.4052 ECM Lab Services Mission: To provide fee-based services and ECM centric solutions around our products with profitable delivery, high customer satisfaction and rapid ROI realization. Information Clearing House for OmniFind (my blog) Worldwide Discovery (OmniFind) Tech SalesWiki IBM Enterprise Content Management Eddie Epstein <eaepst...@gmail. com> To [email protected] 05/19/2009 06:04 cc PM Subject Re: document structure (was: Please respond to Discussion of next UIMA release) uima-u...@incubat or.apache.org Hi Greg, Since your original proposal back in 2007 there has been a growing effort to add annotators to the project. Do you have any components that use the proposed document model type system, say a collection reader, that you would be willing to submit? Regards, Eddie On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Greg Holmberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I feel that the lack of any standard in UIMA regarding the structure of the > document being analyzed (that is, beyond simply plain text) makes it pretty > much impossible to combine annotators from different sources--one of the > primary justifications of UIMA, in my opinion. > > I sketched a possible solution to this on the wiki > (http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uima-sandbox-components.html, see "Document > model") back in 2007, but it didn't generate much interest. There's also a > proposal for document properties, beyond the simple > SourceDocumentInformation class. > >
