On 27 Jul 2011, at 14:31, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi all, > > I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential > customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes. > > Just to be clear, I'm for static prefix delegation to residential > customers, however I heard that some ISPs are doing dynamic delegations, > the same way as is common today with IPv4. > > I don't thin it make sense, as the main reason for doing so in IPv4 was > address exhaustion and legacy oversubscription models such as PPP/dial-up. > > Regards, > Jordi > > PS: I've sent this question to NANOG, got very few answers, so trying here
Hi Jordi, I had asked for you; the only response so far was from Tom Storey: > Australian ISP Internode is doing static allocations. > > http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1742650&p=6#r107 Please add any further replies here :) Tim
