Suspect that will be a tad more pricey than cdwm :D

From: Tom Storey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, 16 June 2013 21:16
To: "Neil J. McRae" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Dariush Marsh-Mossadeghi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [uknof] CWDM kit...

Yeah, 100G coherent.

They also have a 4x25 variant.

http://www.btisystems.com/products/bti-7800-series.aspx#tabs-2


On 16 June 2013 01:18, Neil J. McRae <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Assume the latter is a coherent system rather than coarse?

Neil.

From: Tom Storey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, 16 June 2013 00:16
To: Dariush Marsh-Mossadeghi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Subject: Re: [uknof] CWDM kit...

Ive worked on a lot of BTI gear and have no complaints.

http://btisystems.com/

Their latest system is meant to be capable of 96 x 100G channels.


On 14 June 2013 09:53, Dariush Marsh-Mossadeghi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So I count that as three +1's for ghip.

I'm curious, what makes them stand out from the crowd ?
Are they just bog standard at the right price ?
or is something specific ? ...specification, build quality, customer Service, 
price ?

Slightly off-topic etymological question that seems like the sort of trivia 
that the list might have an opinion on
A mate of mine said to me that the term 'bog standard' was short for 'British 
or German standard', an engineering term dating back to times when the label 
was some mark of quality. This contradicts the google-verse opinions but seems 
more plausible than some of the proffered explanations. Anyone here come across 
this ?

Dariush


On 14 Jun 2013, at 05:22, Mark Prior <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> On 14/06/13 1:51 AM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>> ghipsystems.com<http://ghipsystems.com> and 
>> cubeoptics.com<http://cubeoptics.com> are our favourites
>>
>
> +1 for ghipsystems
>
> Mark.
>
>




Reply via email to