Evening folks,

I found myself troubleshooting an odd problem Thursday and Friday (not helped at all by Sheffield's hospitality over the previous two nights) - several employees of a customer have all had issues in the past few months getting VPNs connected reliably. A colleague was on-site at one location trying to find out what was going on.

The common theme is that all of the broken ones use Sky for DSL/FTTC, and all seem to use the SR102 router. At the locations where we've been testing, the software version is 2.88.1086.R.

Naturally, the problem is intermittent - you might get 1 failed attempt in 5, or if unlucky 1 success out of 5; however, we've got to a point where it will reliably work if a laptop is given a static DHCP address, and the router configured to forward all VPN traffic to that address (I didn't do this, so don't know *exactly* what the magic static NAT is that makes this go).

VPN is a standard IPSEC with NAT translation enabled; using the Shrew client on Windows 7 laptops. This has worked fine in the past and became unreliable around July time - we think they may have pushed a firmware upgrade to the routers to enable v6 at this point. We thought it may be a v6 issue (in that with the VPN up, the DNS will reply with a v6 address of their server, which will be firewalled from their Sky LAN-side V6 subnet ... but this hasn't been an issue, the VPN doesn't establish).

Anyone else seen anything like this? Are there any known issues with the VPN passthrough on these boxes? Google doesn't seem to have anything relevant and recent.

Thanks

Paul.

Reply via email to