On 25/09/2015 14:14, Neil J. McRae wrote: > On the network side each individual atom is simple enough to automate > (but rarely provides any value) but the area we have completely failed > as an industry is pulling those atoms together as a set of services or a > capability outcome, mostly down to our lack of ambition to change how we > create and operate networks (interconnect and peering are top of the > list for change in my view).
it's easy enough to complain about tools and constructs not being there, but there's another fundamental problem, namely that the config semantic requirements of the network are complicated relative to the simplicity of the config atoms. Mixing in different language interpretations from different vendors adds to the mess. Nick
