Tom Hill wrote: [...]
> And of course, the age-old argument; criminals. The minute the > Government realise that they can't see 'into' VPNs terminating in > $other_country, is the minute they'll want to mitigate their use. "We're > not breaking encryption, we're just blocking criminals from using it. > There will be no safe spaces for criminals and terrorists! The IP Bill > 2016 says we can interfere with whatever we like, so suck it up." How would they do that without breaking corporate VPN access for people whose companies are based in other countries? Regards, Leo
