Hi Paul if you are using traffic shaping on the CCRs use Simplequeues... and create lots of them... you are btter off spliting the queues into multiple queues so that they get pushed onto other cores...
ie if you have a /22 for giving bandiwdth to a campus... create 16 queues with /26 networks as the target of the queues so that it will use 16 cores for the queue and not just 1 core for the /22 ... oh yeah lab up VRFs and route leaking if you are planning to use them on your CCRs Hope tis helps... On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Paul Bone <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all the replies on this one, nice to hear good reports. > > > > I have no intention of running full table in these as I have invested in > Juniper MX routers for this job but as a CE or PE the CCR looks a very good > option. Our service is generally multi-tenant buildings and parks so the > traffic shaping capabilities are certainly interesting if I can work this > feature directly into the CE or PE. > > > > Best regards, Paul > > > > > > > -- Kindest regards, Tom Smyth Mobile: +353 87 6193172 --------------------------------- PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify me by telephone or by electronic mail immediately. Any opinions expressed are those of the author, not the company's .This email does not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in writing. You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Thomas Smyth accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by malicious software or attachments.
