Hi,

>    but hey!) but think of all the suckers^w "innovators" that deployed it ten
>    years ago that will have spent a fortune with probably at least two cycles
>    of hardware... as always predicted people would move when they needed... 

suckers? you mean those that already have a better understanind of the protocol,
have the required extra monitoring, scripts etc, understand client
behaviours etc - that hardware cycle occurs anyway - and when VM finally get 
around
to deploying it, they'll see that most of their traffic as an eyeballs network 
will
be IPv6 - all that youtube, google, netflix etc - just needs the client to 
actually
have IPv6 connectivity 

VM are probably looking to move because of the cost of their next CG-NAT 
upgrade ;-)

alan

Reply via email to