We (IX Reach) also provide metro services (ethernet or waves) between most
London DCs including the Telehouse campus.... price is always negotiable to
try to make a business case work!

Telehouse is £3500/year compared to £500/year for a same building XC, tho
you need one for each end so its potentially £2500/yr .. only ~£200/mo on
the table for the network service. Tho you can also potentially aggregate a
few things into a single port to get more value..

HTH
Steve



On 28 June 2018 at 14:58, Edward Dore <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Going back through the email chain with Telehouse and looking at the PDFs
> they sent, it looks like this should have been £1400 install £3500/year,
> but was discounted to £500 install and £1080/year for some reason (they
> only gave the discounted price in the body of the email, hence I missed the
> original price).
>
>
>
> Edward Dore
>
> Freethought Internet
>
>
>
> *From: *Edward Dore <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Thursday, 28 June 2018 at 14:49
> *To: *Matthew Skipsey | M12 Solutions <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [uknof] THN to THW cost effective ILK alternative for TTB
> NNI
>
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
>
> I’ve just double checked and the ILK pricing that I had from Telehouse in
> January was £500 install and £1080/year for a single mode pair. I’m not
> sure if that was some kind of offer.
>
>
>
> Edward Dore
>
> Freethought Internet
>
>
>
> *From: *Matthew Skipsey | M12 Solutions <matthew.skipsey@m12solutions.
> co.uk>
> *Date: *Thursday, 28 June 2018 at 14:13
> *To: *Edward Dore <[email protected]>, "
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [uknof] THN to THW cost effective ILK alternative for TTB
> NNI
>
>
>
> Hi Edward,
>
>
>
> I was kind of hoping there would be some kind of waiting list, because
> networks consolidate, 1Gbs upgrade to 10Gbs; but it appears not??
>
>
>
> £90/month! I wish! ☺ Over triple that is our quote. ☹
>
> £3800 annually. A joke for an NNI.
>
> Perhaps TH are leasing the fibre from Equinix!?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>

Reply via email to