OK - this triggers my OCD slightly. Why is there somewhat inconsistent naming on PeeringDB amongst families of networks. This isn’t, per se, a BT issues, many other large organizations have this issue. In fact BT are pretty close to being consistent (but not perfect):
BT (5400) BT ACCESS (18024) BT DC (18025) BT ES Datacenter and hosting (12541) BT Ireland (2110) BT Italia (8968) BT LatAm (7908) BT Latam Brasil (11271) BT Spain (8903) BTnet (BT's UK IP Network - AS2856) (2856) British Telecom GIIB (3300) Some (OCD’ed) thoughts: The lowercase “h” in “hosting” is somewhat annoying. The “A” vs “a” for the Latam/LatAm Network is just evil! The nakedness of just “BT” for AS5400 is highly assumptive. AS3300 has been renamed a few time; but isn’t it “GIB” vs “GIIB”? But I digress from the question posed on the mailing list. For that, I’ll let others respond. I have, sarcastically, zero idea where to find that answer. 🙄 Happy Monday y’all! Martin > On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:55 AM, Matthew Mercer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Please can someone from BT who's able to look at peering please contact me > off list. > > Kindest Regards, > Matthew Mercer > Broadband For The Rural North LTD > Network Support Engineer > > ************************************************************************** > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual/s to which it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Broadband for the Rural North Limited. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email please notify the author immediately and > delete all copies of the email on your system. If you are not the intended > recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this > e-mail. > > Registered Office: B4RN, The Old Station Yard, Melling, Carnforth, > Lancashire, LA6 2QY. Company Number: IP03135
