Hi, On Wed 29 Sep 2021 15:27:21 GMT, George Tasioulis wrote: > Apparently they suggest that in order for them to accept my /32 announcement > (using their blackhole community), it needs to have a ROA in order to be RPKI > valid. Otherwise they reject it (which is why ours tests failed). > > […] > > So here I am, asking the community for their input on this matter. > - Have you had similar issues with your transit providers in the past? > - Shouldn’t blackholing precede RPKI validation so that the “invalid” /32 > announcement doesn’t matter? > > - What do you think about their suggestion to add a second ROA with maxLength > value of /32 – what are the implication?
I have an upstream that is doing that, it’s indeed a PITA. -- Alarig Le Lay
