--- Begin Message --- No because we're not wanting BFD to control whether there is, or is not, a static route (which is what that page is talking about).  It would seem BFD can only be linked to things under 'set routing-options' such as static routes, OSPF, BGP, etc...

We'd want to use BFD to control whether a pseudowire can or can't form to to the particular unit it was monitoring... and can't see a way to do that.

Steven Maddox
Business Systems Engineer
Internet Central Limited

Registered in England & Wales number 03079542 at Ivy House Foundry, 
Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 3NR.  VAT registration number GB278923705.  Read our disclaimer 
athttp://ic.uk/legal  before acting on this e-mail.

On 05/04/2023 15:41, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
This email originated from OUTSIDE the Internet Central Corporate Network. Please treat HYPERLINKS and ATTACHMENTS with caution. You also just run it over a point-to-point eg https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/high-availability/topics/topic-map/bfd-configuring.html

Doesn't this work for your setup?

On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 14:17, Steven Maddox via uknof <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 29/03/2023 12:41, Richard Halfpenny wrote:
    > BGP to the customer's own router/firewall?

    Sure BGP, BFD, OSPF, ICMP, lots of stuff the customers router
    could do,
    which we can check for (ICMP being the most ubiquitous and
    simplest to
    just check for a non-reply).  However the problem with this
    approach is
    finding an elegant way for the Juniper to automatically take that
    non-reply as a reason to drop the related pseudowire path...
    whilst at
    the same time knowing when its back to then allow that path to
    reform!
    The hope is to still try and find a way of doing this using the
    features
    of a Juniper only.

    But here is a possible inelegant way!..

    Imagine for a moment you've got two suppliers NNIs on a QFX5100...
    one
    as ge-1/0/1 (e.g. BT Wholesale) and one as ge-1/0/2 (e.g. TalkTalk).

    A customer has two leased lines coming in on that same QFX5100,
    one is
    their primary line as unit ge-1/0/1.100 and one is their backup
    line as
    unit ge-1/0/2.200.  Coincidentally unit 100 uses VLAN 100 and unit
    200
    uses VLAN 200 :)

    However the customers public /30 (for Internet access) lives on an
    MX480
    on unit lt-4/0/0.999.  You want lt-4/0/0.999 to form a pseudowire to
    ge-1/0/1.100 (primary path), unless that destination unit is
    "down", in
    which case form it to ge-1/0/1.200 (secondary path).  But still keep
    checking to see if the primary path becomes possible again and
    swap back
    to it when it can automatically.

    But ge-1/0/1.100 and ge-1/0/1.200 won't ever go "down" (as they're
    VLANs
    on an NNI).

    We *could* put two extra units on the QFX of ge-1/0/1.10100 (also
    listening to vlan 100) and ge-1/0/1.10200 (vlan 200) that just have
    private subnets on them (that customers router would also need). 
    Then
    some script (running on the QFX) could do ping tests to see which is
    working, and the one that isn't working gets its pseudowire config
    purefully hobbled (forcing the MX480 to use the other path) and then
    when it returns working... unhobble it :P


    On 29/03/2023 05:48, scott via uknof wrote:
    > BFD is made for this (Both up and down) if the provider will do
    that
    > with you
    Well that's my thoughts exactly, which is why I mentioned BFD in the
    original e-mail.

    But with Junipers it seems that BFD must be tied to something else
    (e.g.
    a static route, BGP, OSPF, etc...) and it can't be tied to whether a
    unit should be considered a valid endpoint for a pseudowire or not :S

    At least, not anything we've found!


    On 28/03/2023 13:13, James Greig wrote:
    > we monitor for a "significant traffic drop"

    Yeah we use Observium too, although lately we've begun to regret
    it as
    some of their users seem, err fanatical?  The other month I
    accidentally
    pasted my clipboard into their Discord (about a dozen words, nothing
    long), unfortunately one of their users fancies themselves as a
    codebreaker... and thought they'd "deciphered" the word 'LibreNMS' in
    the contents (and we don't even use LibreNMS, we pay for Observium).
    Apparently any mention of that project (even if you just plainly
    didn't
    mention it!?) gets you an instant and permanent ban... it's
    completely
    nutty there!

    As for your approach though... ultimately I'd be worried that it'd
    mean
    pseudowires would flip between circuits in the middle of night when
    usage goes low.


    Steven Maddox
    Business Systems Engineer
    Internet Central Limited

    Registered in England & Wales number 03079542 at Ivy House Foundry,
    Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 3NR.  VAT registration number GB278923705. 
    Read our
    disclaimer at http://ic.uk/legal before acting on this e-mail.




*CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER NOTICE: *
This email is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and/or otherwise authorized personnel. The information contained herein and attached is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that viewing this message and any attachments, as well as copying, forwarding, printing, and disseminating any information related to this email is prohibited, and that you should not take any action based on the content of this email and/or its attachments. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email and any attachment. Please note that the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the company. While antivirus protection tools have been employed, you should check this email and attachments for the presence of viruses. No warranties or assurances are made in relation to the safety and content of this email and attachments. The Company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by or contained in this email and attachments. No liability is accepted for any consequences arising from this email.

*AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ ET DE NON RESPONSABILITE* :
Ce courriel, ainsi que toute pièce jointe, est confidentiel et peut être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous n’en êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser l’expéditeur immédiatement et le supprimer. Vous ne devez pas le copier, ni l’utiliser à quelque fin que ce soit, ni divulguer son contenu à qui que ce soit. BSO se réserve le droit de contrôler toute transmission qui passe par son réseau. Veuillez noter que les opinions exprimées dans cet e-mail sont uniquement celles de l'auteur et ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles de la société. Bien que des outils de protection antivirus aient été utilisés, vous devez vérifier cet e-mail et les pièces jointes pour toute présence de virus. Aucune garantie ou assurance n'est donnée concernant la sécurité et le contenu de cet e-mail et de ses pièces jointes. La Société décline toute responsabilité pour tout dommage causé par tout virus transmis par ou contenu dans cet e-mail et ses pièces jointes. Aucune responsabilité n'est acceptée pour les conséquences découlant de cet e-mail.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to