Hi Janak I attach the listener during the initialization of a view. After attaching the listener, I do more initialization. If I call setSelectionInterval in the latter initialization, my listeners get called earlier than if I call addRowSelectionInterval (which led to an exception in my code because initialization was not over, yet).
I have no self-contained example since I had no extra time to spend on this problem. Using addRowSelectionInterval seemed like a good enough solution when the previous selection is empty. But I'm sure you can find in the ULC core code, that setSelectionInterval vs. addRowSelectionInterval on a table without a previous selection are handled differently with regard to when the listeners are notified. Regards, Etienne -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janak Mulani Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 4:10 AM To: Etienne Studer Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com Subject: [ULC-developer] (UBA-7105) ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() and ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) do not fire event in the same sequence Hi Etienne, Could you please explain "an event is fired but it is fired at different points in time"? An event is fired in both cases, but what do you mean by "at different points in time"? How is it affecting your program behaviour? I suspect it could be related to https://www.canoo.com/jira/browse/UBA-7068 (about order of listners) but I need more information from you to confirm this. Thanks and regards, Janak >-----Original Message----- >From: Etienne Studer (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 8:17 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [JIRA] Updated: (UBA-7105) ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() >and ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) do not fire >event in the same sequence > > > [ https://www.canoo.com/jira/browse/UBA-7105?page=all ] > >Etienne Studer updated UBA-7105: >-------------------------------- > > Description: >We observe different behavior between calling >ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() and >ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) . I can see that >in both cases an event is fired but it is fired at different points in >time. > > > was: >We observe different behavior between calling >ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() and >ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) . I can see that >in both cases an event is fired but it is fired at different point in >times. > > > >> ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() and >ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) do not fire event >in the same sequence >> >------------------------------------------------------------------- >--------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: UBA-7105 >> URL: https://www.canoo.com/jira/browse/UBA-7105 >> Project: ULCBase >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: core >> Affects Versions: ULC 6.1.1 >> Reporter: Etienne Studer >> Assigned To: ULC Team >> >> We observe different behavior between calling >ULCTable#addRowSelectionInterval() and >ULCListSelectionModel#setSelectionInterval(int, int) . I can see that >in both cases an event is fired but it is fired at different points in >time. > >-- >This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >- >If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >administrators: https://www.canoo.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >- >For more information on JIRA, see: >http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > _______________________________________________ ULC-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer _______________________________________________ ULC-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
