Hallo Daniel,
if we use ZipCarrierStreamProvider it's very cpu intensive on our
webserver machine(websphere/os400).
Therefore we need a load-tool to compare the
CarrierStreamProvider with/without zipping.
I think in ulc-load3.0 it's also not possible to run/play a
scenario with different CarrierStreamProviders?
This should also be possible to have a real comparison.
So, it would be good if we get as soon as possible a solution to
continue our load test.
Thx very much,
Marco
Daniel Grob
<daniel.grob@
canoo.com> An
Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ulc-developer m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie
canoo.com
Thema
Re: [ULC-developer] ulc load
30.04.2007 3.0 -
16:16 trivialcarrierstreamprovider
Bitte
antworten an
ulc-developer
@lists.canoo.
com
Hi Marco,
Sorry, this is a bug in ULC Load. It is currently not possible to
use
carrier stream providers other than the ZipCarrierStreamProvider
(i.e.
the default one).
I opened issue http://www.canoo.com/jira/browse/ULO-645 in our
issue
data base for this issue.
How important is this for you?
Regards Dany
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> i use ulc-load 3.0 and ulc6.1.3.
> I use as carrier-stream-provider the
> trivialcarrierstreamprovider.
> I was able to record a scenario but if i try to replay the
> scenario I get following error:
>
>
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic05093.jpg)
>
>
> Is it possible in ulc-load 3.0 to record a scenario with a
> special carrier-stream-provider and to play the scenario with
> different carrier-stream-providers?
>
> Thx
> Marco
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
_______________________________________________
ULC-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
_______________________________________________
ULC-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
