On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, David Zakar wrote:

<cheapshot>Although I guess, unlike some inferior distros, they actually
bothered to use a package manager. I heard some distros are still stuck
back in 94 on that score...</cheapshot>

I'll take the bait.  I must admit that in all my years of using slackware
I've never, ever, felt the need for a package manager with dependency
support (which is what I guess you mean, because Slackware definitely has
a package manager.  It's even called "installpkg").

I have on the otherhand, loudly and frequently cursed rpm on both redhat,
fedora, and suse for being horribly difficult to use at times.

I have only rarely used debian, and have never used gentoo so I won't open
up those particular flame wars.

Vince

Reply via email to