David Zakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not indicative of what you claimed, which is that Slack is easier > to use. It means more people are complaining about RH/FC. _Why_ could be > one of many reasons, not all (in fact, very few) of which have to do > with Slack's superiority.
I didn't mean to say Slack is superior. Just that it isn't inferior. > At the end of the day, the RH/FC userbase utterly dwarfs Slack's. If > that's not telling, I don't know what is. It is indeed telling - perhaps that RH is well marketed, and Slackware is not. > > -DMZ > > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:43 -0400, J. Milgram wrote: > > > > Without going into any hard science on this, the overall prevalence > > (and > > type) of RH (debian, suse etc) complaints vs. Slackware complaints > > should > > be indicative of something. >
