Can someone re-subscribe me?
Not the first time this has happened.
I suspect that his.com is shutting down um-linux because of spam to that
list. I never had this problem back when we were on majordomo.
Judah
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 00:00:23 -0400
From: "University of Maryland LISTSERV Server (14.5)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Judah Milgram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Your removal from the UM-LINUX list
Tue, 9 May 2006 00:00:23
You have been automatically removed from the UM-LINUX list (UM Linux
User's Group) as a result of repeated delivery error reports from your
mail system. This decision was based on the automatic error monitoring
policy in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed or otherwise
confirmed by a human being. If you receive this message, it means that
something is wrong: while you are obviously able to receive mail, your
mail system has been regularly reporting that your account did not exist,
or that you were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. Here is
some information which may assist you or your local help desk in
determining the cause of the problem:
- The failing address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- The first error was reported on 2006-05-04.
- Since then, a total of 4 delivery errors have been received.
- The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe
to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail
administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to
the UM-LINUX list, and also affects your private mail. This means that
YOU HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write
to you during the same time frame will probably have received the same
errors for the same reason. The UM-LINUX list is but one of the many
people who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was
malfunctioning.
DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never
normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not
exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some
of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written
correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than
others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the
tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are
receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to
a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail
systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this
level of service is acceptable or not.
