1) We can fight tooth and nail to keep what we have
2) We can have them decide what things to change
3) We can come up with something witty and submit it for approval because hey, it doesn't really matter. ==> Thus why I voted aye immediately because who really cares? Plus it'll be funny to see them wrap their brains around a recursive acronym :P
my 2 cents at least
On 8/8/06, John Demme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I've been dealing with University staff in the OCP on this one- I don't think the SGA cares, but the OCP staff are the gatekeepers. I've got some issues with the SGA as well, but thus far my experiences with the SGA haven't been too bad- it's issues with the University staff-run parts which have been the hardest part to deal with.
~JohnOn 8/8/06, Rob < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> What has changed? I'm not certain. Some asshole bureaucrat was probably
> just bored some afternoon. I couldn't get a straight answer out of them as
> to why now, and why we weren't informed of this when we started using it
> years ago.
<bitter>
IMHO, the high level problem is giving students (read: SGA) $1.x million
(x==5?) in student activity fees to deal with as they wish. It is
as close to absolute power as most people will see, so it will be as
close to absolute corruption as people will ever see :-( As a result,
you see stupid shit like this.
</bitter>
- Rob
.
--
Christopher Conroy
