No luck for me. See below. I think the Johnson bar on the
cable-to-ethernet router must be broken. Lesson learned is do
accept_unresolvable_domains. But I actually think I get a lot less spam
lately, for some reason, so it's OK.

Judah



mite:~: dig umd.edu MX

; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P2 <<>> umd.edu MX
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOTIMP, id: 1081
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;umd.edu.                       IN      MX

;; Query time: 163 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Mon Jan 15 14:49:16 2007
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 25

mite:~: dig umd.edu MX +trace

; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P2 <<>> umd.edu MX +trace
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Received 17 bytes from 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1) in 54 ms



John Demme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I hate to be that guy, but "it works for me"...
> dig umd.edu MX
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> umd.edu MX
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7029
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 2
> 
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;umd.edu.                       IN      MX
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> umd.edu.                15875   IN      MX      10 mailfw2.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                15875   IN      MX      10 mailfw0.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                15875   IN      MX      10 mailfw1.umd.edu.
> 
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> umd.edu.                15442   IN      NS      noc.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                15442   IN      NS      ns1.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                15442   IN      NS      ns2.umd.edu.
> 
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> noc.umd.edu.            120     IN      A       128.8.5.2
> ns2.umd.edu.            59974   IN      A       128.8.76.2
> 
> ;; Query time: 7 msec
> ;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53 (192.168.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 15 19:24:39 2007
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 183
> 
> 
> host -a gives the same result.
> 
> I'm not certain how to do it with host, but run a DNS trace.  I use dig, so
> it's "dig umd.edu MX +trace".  It'll run the DNS iterations from the root
> servers itself and show you the results.  I get the following:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dig umd.edu MX +trace
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> umd.edu MX +trace
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> .                       41653   IN      NS      A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> .                       41653   IN      NS      M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> ;; Received 436 bytes from 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1) in 7 ms
> 
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      L3.NSTLD.COM .
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      D3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      A3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      E3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      C3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      G3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      M3.NSTLD.COM.
> edu.                    172800  IN      NS      H3.NSTLD.COM.
> ;; Received 298 bytes from 198.41.0.4#53(A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 15 ms
> 
> umd.edu.                172800  IN      NS      NS2.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                172800  IN      NS      NOC.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                172800  IN      NS      NS1.umd.edu .
> ;; Received 127 bytes from 192.41.162.32#53(L3.NSTLD.COM) in 27 ms
> 
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      MX      10 mailfw1.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      MX      10 mailfw2.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      MX      10 mailfw0.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      NS      ns2.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      NS      noc.umd.edu.
> umd.edu.                60000   IN      NS      ns1.umd.edu.
> ;; Received 247 bytes from 128.8.76.2#53( NS2.umd.edu) in 16 ms
> 
> 
> It's a good tool to figure out where the failure point is, plus it doesn't
> use your ISP's DNS servers, so it'll tell you if it's just an issue with
> them.
> 
> Also, another option with dig is "dig umd.edu MX @<some dns server>" so you
> can query individual DNS servers.  You might also use that to query your
> suspected failure points.  So, in order to check what each of your ISP's DNS
> servers are returning, use:
> cat /etc/resolv.conf | grep nameserver | sed s/nameserver\\s*// | xargs -I
> ns dig umd.edu MX @ns
> 
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> ~John
> 
> On 1/15/07, Judah Milgram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nope, no mx records here, see below.
> >
> > I'm not even sure what nameserver I'm using because this is DHCP to some
> > broadband service. Comcast, I think (wireless at a friend's
> > house). Probably that's the source of the broken-ness.
> >
> > The other question is why fetchmail flushes mail off the server if local
> > sendmail won't take it. Probably a feature not a bug but still, seems
> > pretty harmful default behavior. I just lost two critical emails.
> >
> > mite:~: host -a umd.edu
> > Trying "umd.edu"
> > Host umd.edu not found: 4(NOTIMP)
> > Received 25 bytes from 192.168.0.1#53 in 21 ms
> >
> > Judah
> >
> > Daniel Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is not an actual hostname for umd.edu assigned for a variety of
> > > reasons, but there are MX records for umd.edu which is why everything
> > works
> > > fine.  I have not seen a mailer before reject mail for this reason.  If
> > you
> > > do a host -a you will see the MX records for it.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: UM Linux User's Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > Judah Milgram
> > > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:58 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [UM-LINUX] "umd.edu" doesn't resolve?
> > >
> > > very odd thing ... I just lost two emails from someone with an
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > address
> > > because sendmail couldn't resolve his domain: (name x'd to protect the
> > > innocent)
> > >
> > > reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3 of 23 (2354 header octets)
> > > ..fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Domain of sender
> > > address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist
> > >  flushed
> > > reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4 of 23 (2327 header octets)
> > > ..fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >... Domain of 
> > > sender
> > > address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist
> > >  flushed
> > >
> > > a quick check:
> > >
> > > mite:~: host umd.edu
> > > Host umd.edu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> > >
> > > and verified it on another machine. That's can't be right - or?! Anyone
> > > else having this sort of problem? Meanwhile, I turned on
> > > accept_unresolvable_domains.
> > >
> > > Judah
> > >
> >

Reply via email to