You may find this useful. Its called Zotero and is a firefox plugin

http://www.downloadsquad.com/2006/11/27/zotero-firefox-bibliography-plugin/

-gaurav


On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Nick Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For a while I've really wanted to have some sort of database that would
> allow me to keep track of papers relevant to my research.  Basically,
> right now I just download papers I find that are of interest, and put
> them in a hierarchy of directories by subject.  This has a couple of
> problems: 1) It takes time to do the organizing.  2) The subject matter
> of papers is not hierarchical, it's more of a web. 3) There's no easy
> way to store metadata about the paper (e.g., author & title) such that
> it can be browsed through without opening every paper. 4) No convenient
> way to track read/unread status. 5) It's not searchable.  I'm hoping
> there's a piece of software one can use on Linux to help with this sort
> of thing, either software specifically for this purpose or one that
> could be adapted without very much work (or much programming
> expertise).  Surely some of you bright academics have tried to find a
> solution to this sort of problem before.  :-)  I'm also open to web
> services for these purposes, my only hesitation is that I may then end
> up with my info locked into it with no possibility to migrate later.
>
> I've come up with some idea for solutions, but none seem all that good:
> 1) I could simply keep a spreadsheet (or text file) with each paper's
> associated information (bibliographic info, read/unread status,
> tags/keywords) and the file name of the paper (if it exists). 2) Try to
> use my BibTeX bibliographic database and Pybliographic GUI to keep track
> of all the info about papers and, again, point to file locations (not
> sure how feasible this is). 3) Hope I can find a URL for the abstract of
> each paper and use del.icio.us to bookmark and tag each one.  Make sure
> to put all bibliographic info in the notes section.
>
> Of those, #1 seems like the most plausible solution but far from ideal.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick
>
>

Reply via email to