My first thought was it could be an indirect link. Is that possible? On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 5:55 PM Peter J. Teuben <teu...@umd.edu> wrote:
> Maybe a statc link. The strings command might give names you recognize > > On Sun, May 25, 2025, 17:02 J. Milgram <milg...@cgpp.com> wrote: > >> Here's a mystery I'm hoping someone can explain: >> >> I just built octave (9.2.0). As usual, an easy build. But this time I'm >> curious: How can I confirm that it linked against OpenBLAS and not one >> of the other blas's I have installed? >> >> ldd /usr/bin/octave doesn't turn up any blas libraries at all. (huh?!) >> >> The build procedure is advertised as using the first blas it finds from >> the list [ OpenBLAS, atlas, netlib reference implementation ]. I have >> the first and third installed so am hoping for OpenBLAS. >> >> Anyone know a way to check this? Or why ldd doesn't show the executable >> linked to any blas at all? >> >> thanks! And a meaningful Mem Day to all. >> >> Judah >> >> >> >> -- >> ===== >> milg...@cgpp.com >> 301-257-7069 >> >> You received this email because you are subscribed to the UM Linux User's >> Group (UM-LINUX) mailing list. If you would like to unsubscribe from this >> list, simply send an email to lists...@listserv.umd.edu with the message >> signoff UM-LINUX in the body. >> > You received this email because you are subscribed to the UM Linux User's > Group (UM-LINUX) mailing list. If you would like to unsubscribe from this > list, simply send an email to lists...@listserv.umd.edu with the message > signoff UM-LINUX in the body. You received this email because you are subscribed to the UM Linux User's Group (UM-LINUX) mailing list. If you would like to unsubscribe from this list, simply send an email to lists...@listserv.umd.edu with the message signoff UM-LINUX in the body.
