2008/12/21 Guilherme Polo <[email protected]>:
> Hi there,
>
> I wouldn't be posting there had I not seen nopper's last commit on
> trunk, but it should serve for everyone else too.
>
> Let me talk more about the specific commit that made me write this,
> the affected files are trunk/umit and trunk/umitPlugins/Tree.py. I'm
> fine with the former, it is a nice one, the later is probably also
> fine but notice it is changing a file inside umitPlugins which lives
> in the branch UmitPlugins.
> One would naturally think that a branch would contain the most updated
> files related to the branch (like umitPlugins/Tree.py here), but there
> is something very wrong going on here, for some reason the branch
> UmitPlugins (and maybe others, but I didn't check) have specific files
> in the branch that are outdated when compared to the ones merged into
> trunk. That just can't be right.

Not necessary. My branch is a little outdated and after the merge into
trunk I've preferred to work directly on trunk because svn is lesser
usable than git if you have multiple branches. It was only a choice to
improve simplicity of operations.

> Any file being changed that has its own branch should first be changed
> in the branch, tested if the change is substantial, and only then
> merged into trunk. If this is not going to happen, just delete the
> branch and let the trunk be a mess.

The change in this case was minimum so no worry about testing, it was
only a stupid fix. And, yes, for me it's better to delete the merged
branches.

> I'm almost forgetting about email's title: "Defining rules for comitting"
> We should set some rules for using umit's repository now that there a
> couple of branches, some of them merged into trunk. I will not be
> trying to make your life harder, on the contrary.
> These are the rules that come to my mind right now:
>
> 1. Initialize svnmerge on your branch;
> 2. Initialize svnmerge from the trunk to your branch if you are
> planning to merge your branch into trunk, or if the branch has already
> been merged;
> 3. If you are planning to change something:
>     i) If the thing has a branch for it, change the thing that lives
> in the branch
>    ii) If the thing is trunk-specific, then just change it
> 4. If you are planning to commit something:
>     i) if the thing has a branch for it, the commit should be done in
> the branch
>    ii) if the thing is trunk-specific, then there should be a ticket
> in the trac *
>   iii) if you are merging something into trunk, use svnmerge and then
> use the generated commit msg file to commit
>
> * There could be exceptions on this.
>
> Initially it will be a pain to use svnmerge, at least it was in my
> branch, because it will mark up to the last trunk commit as already
> integrated in your branch (or from the trunk to your branch). When
> creating new branches we should enforce these rules if the branch has
> any interest in being merged into the trunk, and everything will be
> easier.
> So in the case of my branch, it has been around 1 year since I did
> something on it, and about 10 months since I (manually) merged changes
> from the trunk to it, so there were a lot of new changes to be merged.
> What I did was block (using svnmerge) the revisions I didn't want
> based on: branch creation and merges that were already manually merged
> (this one was what caused some trouble), the rest of the changes were
> merged and solved conflicts manually where necessary. Now that it has
> svnmerge with proper revisions merged and blocked, it gets much easier
> to manage changes from the trunk, and after I merge it into trunk it
> will also get very easy to sync changes from my branch to the trunk.
>
> I hope you consider using something as noted,
>

I prefer to use svn merge command without blocking anything and not
dirty repo logs. Btw everyone is free to choose.

+1 for the defining rules necessary to avoid these problems and sorry
for the mistake but I don't have a protocol to follow so I did my best

--
Best regards,
Francesco Piccinno

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Umit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel

Reply via email to