On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Guilherme Polo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Bartosz SKOWRON <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Adriano Marques <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If we don't run on 2.4 currently is due to minor details, than it's >>> better to find then, fix and support 2.4 at least. 2.3 is going to be >>> harder, and maybe useless to support, as I'm not sure if people will >>> find all our libraries for versions lower than 2.4. Nice catch ;-) >> >> please check the nopper's comment[1]. I would like to hear your >> opinion about what we are going to do :) >> >> [1] http://trac.umitproject.org/ticket/197#comment:1 >> > > Well, given nopper is using the namespace api for no reason the > solution is simple: stop using it for no reason. Then that bug is no > longer a concern. > > When I say it is being used for no reason is because I did a quick > look in that branch and all the usage towards the sax namespace api is > done by not using a namespace, just by using the namespace api. >
It is all good now, if trunk and PacketManipulator (ticket 197) still fails somewhere with python 2.4 then create a ticket please. -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
