Hi guilherme!

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Guilherme Polo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Forgot to send to the list
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Guilherme Polo <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [umit-devel] Putting all umit packages inside an umit package
> To: Francesco Piccinno <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Francesco Piccinno
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2009/2/27 Guilherme Polo <[email protected]>:
>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Francesco Piccinno <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 2009/2/27 Rodolfo S. Carvalho <[email protected]>:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Guilherme Polo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we move to a cleaner namespace in umit ? I'm hoping to change it 
>>>>>> from:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> umitCore
>>>>>> umitCore.radialnet
>>>>>> umitGUI
>>>>>> umitGUI.radialnet
>>>>>> umitDB
>>>>>> umitInterfaceEditor
>>>>>> umitInterfaceEditor.selectborder
>>>>>> umitInventory
>>>>>> umitPlugin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> umit
>>>>>> umit.core
>>>>>> umit.core.radialnet
>>>>>> umit.gui
>>>>>> umit.gui.radialnet
>>>>>> umit.db
>>>>>> umit.interfaceeditor
>>>>>> umit.interfaceeditor.selectborder
>>>>>> umit.inventory
>>>>>> umit.plugin
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree totally with this structure. I like the idea of having a
>>>>> 'umit' central package.
>>>>> Additionaly, for UmitWeb, we can have the extra packages:
>>>>>
>>>>> umit.web
>>>>> umit.web.views
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Me too but I think that would be better that interfaceeditor is a leaf
>>>> of gui, like also inventory. For plugins i suggest that core and gui
>>>> part should be separetad, so the gui part will be included directly in
>>>> umit.gui while the core part will be umit.core.plugin.
>>>
>>> Uhm, maybe. But this kind of change requires better planning.
>>> umitInventory doesn't fit entirely into umitGUI, so I'm not sure why
>>> you are suggesting to it be entirely inside umit.gui. I also believe
>>> interfaceeditor doesn't fit entirely inside umitGUI, but I'm not
>>> suggesting anything since I haven't looked at its code.
>>
>> I'm not suggesting umitinventory in gui, i've not suggested that about
>> inventory, but I've only copied you original suggestion. Interface
>> editor doesn't fit entirely in gui but it's about gui so I think it's
>> better to have it as a leaf of gui, while the only gui related stuff
>> should be merged in the upper leaf.
>>
>> Btw every owner of a part should think about this refactoring and post
>> his proposal here before refactoring starts.
>>
>
> This is not a refactoring, it is just merely using umit as a main
> package with the other already existing packages as subpackages. You
> are planning a refactor, not my initial proposal.

Sorry, I gues I'm misunderstood. I said 'refactoring' in a meaning of
'change in software structure'.

>
>
> --
> -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Umit-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
>



-- 
    Rodolfo Carvalho
     Web Developer
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Umit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel

Reply via email to