Hello, > Being honest to you, I didn't know about this issue between PyGTK and > threads. Even if I do not touch GTK related code from the threads I > might have problems? I mean, I just wanted to create threads to deal > with network requests. Data collected by these requests should be > shared with the main loop, that handles GTK related code... doing this > way, no GTK would never be touched from the threads... it would not > even be visible.
If the data is being shared with the main loop, that may cause inconsistency on GTK, even though it is not being directly called by the thread. >>> (maybe I can submit another proposal about it... lol :) >> >> Be my guest ;-) > > Do you think it is a good idea? If so, I might start planning it better... You should decide that. Write down a schedule and try to see if all will fit. If it does, than propose it ;-) > I can figure two options. The first one would be using nmap's nse > scripts. The second one is crafting a python script, using python's > sockets, to deal with it. Perhaps we can use some functionalities > provided by UMPA. If you use nmap nse, you'll end up with an inter-process communication issue and a lot of processes running in parallel. UMPA doesn't look like the solution for that. Perhaps, we'll have to tailor our own solution. Cheers! -- Adriano Monteiro Marques http://adriano-marques.blogspot.com http://www.umitproject.org http://www.pythonbenelux.org "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
