On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Luis A. Bastiao Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> It will be happen with UMPA, PacketManipulator, UmitBT, ZION, QS(QuickScan), > BluetoothSniffing, etc. The distribution of the package will be the same, > what changes is the import. I wanna hear what do you mean by 'the distribution of the package will be the same". Seriously. > All projects belongs to Umit Project, so it make sense that all of them > should be included on umit package. It is similar like Apache organization, > Universitys and others organizations do. We are not inventing nothing :-) I don't know how much you understand structure of Apache code, but not. It's not the same. Sorry. > Please don't discuss it on IRC, if you have something against please send it > to the mailing list. Firstly, who decide it? And why someone wanna decide about some projects which are made by other contributors? I don't like this kind of words like "UMPA will be something", because I would like to have a discussion first. Secondly, this idea about UMPA e.g. is completely bad. I wanna hear some real arguments first. Then I will say why it's bad. bart. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
