> Yes, I got your point. I'm agree. We were working with this thought in the > past, on RadialNet and we decided it exactly by reasons you wrote. > > But I'm aware that we can't do that in Network Inventory nor InterfaceEditor > in day to night. Just it. It is a more complex task.
We could put everything we currently have inside: umit.scan.gui.inventory umit.scan.gui.ieditor And then, whenever we have time, we go moving things that belongs to ...core.inventory and ...core.ieditor. What do you think about this approach? We just need to pay attention on the better way to keep it backward compatible, or we must decide that it should not be backward compatible and just break it, warning our users and plugin developers. Cheers! -- Adriano Monteiro Marques http://adriano-marques.blogspot.com http://www.umitproject.org http://www.pythonbenelux.org "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
