Just fixed for higwidgets, but umit-common is readable/writable by everyone
already. What is the error you're getting?
On May 27, 2011, at 10:38 PM, Zhongjie Wang wrote:
> Hi, I'm also having issues with downloading the higwidgets and umit-common.
> Seems no reading permissions. :(
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Zubair Nabi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay guys,
> I'm done with the .proto.
> I've made a number of changes. Please have a look at the changelog to follow
> them.
> I think these messages are now in a shape that we can start using them in our
> code.
> Just in case, please go through all the messages in detail (following the
> flow of request/response) and if you think that stuff needs to be
> added/deleted/modified then use this thread to discuss them. Also, bear in
> mind that these messages should work for both the aggregator communication as
> well as the p2p communication.
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Adriano Monteiro Marques
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Zubair,
>
> Awesome!! Keep up with the good work. Let me know if you need anything else.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> On May 27, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Zubair Nabi wrote:
>
>> Hi Adriano,
>>
>> No. I was having issues adding the common repository to the mobile
>> repository as submodule but Luis and Rodolfo helped me solve that problem.
>> A couple of messages were missing from the .proto. I added them.
>> Now I'll add the optional messageType field for p2p messages.
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Adriano Monteiro Marques
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Zubair,
>>
>> You have write perms there already... are you having any issues with that
>> repo?
>>
>> On May 27, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Zubair Nabi wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good. Let's keep it a string. The type would be the name.
>>>
>>> Let's keep it optional. It will be used in p2p communication but not in
>>> aggregator communication.
>>> So this is the extra field that I propose:
>>>
>>> optional string messageType = x;
>>>
>>> Does everyone agree?
>>>
>>> Adriano - Do we have write access to the common ICM repository?
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Zhongjie Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Zubair,
>>> That's a good way. I agree. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Zubair Nabi <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> That's a very good point. In case of p2p agents we will only be sending
>>> messages using a standard send function. So, there is no way to tell the
>>> message type. We should add an int32 for message type considering that we
>>> have a standard number of messages.
>>> If int32 messageType == 1 then that could an authentication message and so
>>> on. What do you say?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Zhongjie Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Adriano,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I didn't see the email of that doc. Then it's perfect. :)
>>> There's one more question, how to detect the message type when I receive a
>>> message?
>>> Is there any field to indicate the type?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Adriano Monteiro Marques
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On May 27, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Zhongjie Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Zubair, Diogo:
>>> > I hope you guys could join and figure out the detailed message format
>>> > for the communication interfaces. :)
>>> > In the spec, we have decided to use RESTful webservice and RPC call for
>>> > the communications. Now the
>>> > form of RPC call is somewhat obscure, we need to make a clearly defined
>>> > message format. Do you think we
>>> > should still use protobuf, or json/xml, or customized binary/text format?
>>> > This is important.
>>>
>>> We've already decided on using protobuf, right? Event the ones we defined
>>> today and shared with you in that google doc.
>>>
>>> > At first, there should be an authentication process after connected.
>>> > Then we use the negotiated
>>> > symmetric key to encrypt the following messages. The messages will be in
>>> > pair, like Request/Response.
>>> > For a request, there should be a RPC function name and then the
>>> > parameters, finally maybe end with a checksum.
>>> > And for a response, it will indicate which request it response to, and
>>> > then the result.
>>> > If we use protobuf, then we need to put the function name out of the
>>> > message. So after the agent read the name,
>>> > it will generate a proper class for the message.
>>> >
>>> > How do you think which one we should choose?
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Zhongjie Wang
>>> > Master Candidate
>>> > Computer System Architecture
>>> > Peking University, China
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
>>> > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
>>> > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
>>> > Download your free trial now.
>>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1_______________________________________________
>>> > Umit-devel mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Adriano Monteiro Marques
>>>
>>> http://www.thoughtspad.com
>>> http://www.umitproject.org
>>> http://blog.umitproject.org
>>> http://www.pythonbenelux.org
>>>
>>> "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Zhongjie Wang
>>> Master Candidate
>>> Computer System Architecture
>>> Peking University, China
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
>>> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
>>> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
>>> Download your free trial now.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Umit-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best,
>>> __
>>> Zubair
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Zhongjie Wang
>>> Master Candidate
>>> Computer System Architecture
>>> Peking University, China
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best,
>>> __
>>> Zubair
>>
>> ---
>> Adriano Monteiro Marques
>>
>> http://www.thoughtspad.com
>> http://www.umitproject.org
>> http://blog.umitproject.org
>> http://www.pythonbenelux.org
>>
>> "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> __
>> Zubair
>
> ---
> Adriano Monteiro Marques
>
> http://www.thoughtspad.com
> http://www.umitproject.org
> http://blog.umitproject.org
> http://www.pythonbenelux.org
>
> "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best,
> __
> Zubair
>
>
>
> --
> Zhongjie Wang
> Master Candidate
> Computer System Architecture
> Peking University, China
---
Adriano Monteiro Marques
http://www.thoughtspad.com
http://www.umitproject.org
http://blog.umitproject.org
http://www.pythonbenelux.org
"Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Umit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
