Volume 13, No. 39, 19 September 2014



In this Issue:

*        <http://www.sacp.org.za/main.php?ID=4504#redpen> Respect must apply
- Response to Chirwa`s innuendos
*        <http://www.sacp.org.za/main.php?ID=4504#one> The Hooliganisation
of Parliament by the Imperialist Bloc

 


 

 


Special Edition, Umsebenzi Online

 


 

 


Red Alert:

 

Respect must apply - Response to Chirwa's innuendos



 

"Voters in our fifth democratic, free and fair general election and
parliament they elected resoundingly rejected undemocratic, unfair and
unprincipled politics of innuendo", writes 

 

By Comrade Bonakele Majuba

 

On September 12, the Mail & Guardian published an opinion piece by National
Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) president Andrew Chirwa: "SACP
is leading the Nkandla cover-up". To substantiate this baseless allegation,
Chirwa further alleges that "instead of dealing with principled and
substantive issues, our politics have been reduced to innuendo, conspiracy
theories and personal insults". If he were principled, Chirwa would realise
that he is guilty of what he accuses others of, and that by "our politics",
he is actually referring to their politics and not ours. The opinion piece
under his name represents this for all to see. 

 

The South African Communist Party (SACP) has called for due process on the
Nkandla investigative reports, including that of the Public Protector, to be
followed to the letter and exhausted. This fundamental principle is aimed at
ensuring that substantive issues are addressed, and following credible
processes. 

 

Individuals who prevent this from happening have been, but by no means
exclusively, pursuing undemocratic, unfair and unprincipled politics, using
the matter of Nkandla - as Chirwa did when he became Numsa president - to
call on President Jacob Zuma to go. In sharp contrast, the overwhelming
majority of our voters in a democratic, free and fair general election,
resoundingly rejected the call by voting for the African National Congress
(ANC) with President Zuma as the leading presidential candidate. He was
further re-elected in terms of our country's Constitution as President of
the Republic by our fifth democratically elected parliament.  

 

Having failed, people like Chirwa have now turned on calling for "full
implementation of public protector's recommendations" - this, regardless of
the fact that she submitted her report which together with other reports on
the same matter before Parliament to be duly considered. 

 

For people like Chirwa, calling for due process to be followed to the letter
is to be embedded in the state. By the way, ironically, it is such
individuals who are part of a declared, co-ordinated project to form a
counter-movement and contest elections so that they can be in government -
that is IF they ever win. They have no problem with any party and its
leaders serving in Parliament and government, except the SACP. This is to be
anti-Communist.  

 

What about "insults", "innuendo" and "lies", Chirwa's coalition of
conspiracy? 

 

Chirwa should know that liberalism gives the primacy of position to the
individual instead to the collective. By "liberal", rather than an insult,
it is at least meant those who openly call themselves liberals, or those
who, on a specific ground, exhibit one or more tenet or tendency of
liberalism. In contrast to liberalism, in a progressive trade union where
the principle of worker control has not been overthrown, it is observed and
is not being undermined, the union's president is not a subordinate of the
general secretary. 

 

As opposed to what Chirwa wants us to believe, as a worker leader in a
progressive trade union, the president is the leading office bearer. Unlike
under liberalism and bureaucratic dictatorship, progressive trade union
statements are not an individual's on behalf of the union; they are the
union's on behalf of all individual members and officials, independently of
the division of labour amongst them. 

 

Chirwa is actually the one who gives us the impression that he is covering
up for a new, and dangerous phenomenon of bureaucratic dictatorship which
has taken root in some unions corrosively eroding worker control, instead of
being a champion of worker democracy.

 

Chirwa accuses me of calling his general secretary Irvin Jim a liar. In
contrast, in my article (Umsebenzi Online, September 4) I categorically
state that I "would hate to call Mr Jim a liar. But without doubt, in
addition to distortions, he is being economical with the truth". Likewise, I
would hate to call Mr Chirwa a liar. 

 

What about the issue of the enemy?

 

In address the question in Umsebenzi Online, September 4
<http://www.sacp.org.za/main.php?ID=4489> . From Mr Jim's August 29
statement and previous utterances there can be no doubt that the ANC and
SACP - but by no means not excluding Cosatu for so long as it remains part
of the Alliance - are being projected as the enemy of our people. This is at
the centre of the consistent attacks directed at the Alliance and its
independent formations. 

 

What about the other baseless allegations Chirwa levels against the SACP? In
his own admission he is sarcastic, as he says in his own word "cynical".
Thanks to his own reply to the question - such do not deserve any other
response.   

 

Bonakele Majuba is SACP Mpumalanga Provincial Secretary, the edited version
of this piece was first published by the Mail & Guardian (19 September
2014). 

 


 

The Hooliganisation of Parliament by the Imperialist Bloc

 

By Ian Beddowes 

 

U.S imperialism and its allies are becoming very desperate: their economic
system is facing collapse - and so is their world dominance - and it is not
only communists who are saying so.

 

Marin Katusa, Chief Investment analyst at Casey Research, had this to say in
a recent article published in Business Insider under the title "The Media
Won't Touch This Story About the end of the US Dollar".

 

"As the world's emerging economies gain ever more prominence, the U.S is
losing hold of its position as the world's superpower. Many on the long list
of nations that dislike America are pondering ways to reduce American
influence in their affairs. Ditching the dollar is a very good start."

 

Desperate about losing control, the USA is using every means possible to
hang on to and even expand the territory which they control. In Ukraine,
Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan they are using war, and have used openly Nazi
organisations in Ukraine and Islamic extremists in the Middle East to assist
them. 

 

They are now moving towards a scenario in the Middle-East where the
organisation which they have funded for at least two years to bring down the
secular government of Syria led by President Assad, and which is known in
the press as ISIS or ISIL, following its invasion of Iraq, is now,
conveniently, beheading Americans and Brits, thus providing an excuse to yet
again bomb Iraq and yet again send in U.S troops. Yesterday U.S President
Barrack Obama announced that they will arm the "Syrian opposition" to fight
ISIS. This is double talk. There is no real opposition in Syria. In fact
what Obama's administration will do is to boost terrorist capacity against
Syria.    

 

Back to South Africa. Mindful that GEAR, the 1996 Class Project has only
worked in the interests of white capital and the black tenderpreneurs, the
ANC under the leadership of President Jacob Zuma (but still with a
significant number of tenderpreneurs in the broader movement) has introduced
state planning and worse still, in the eyes of Western Imperialism and its
South African allies and agents, South Africa has joined BRICS - and worse
again, has agreed that the African Regional Centre for the new bank will be
in Johannesburg! Thus the whole continent will have access to an alternative
source of funding to the Washington based International Monetary Fund and
World Bank. 

 

BRICS is already moving away from the dollar standard in its trading
practice, the new bank could inevitably hasten the collapse of the dollar.
Therefore it is of prime importance to the U.S government that this must be
"nipped in the bud". 

 

In South Africa there is a well-co-ordinated destabilisation campaign being
waged by the DA and its right-wing allies, in particular the well-funded EFF
led by the plunderer of Limpopo, Julius Malema. Hence the pushing of the
Nkandla Report while at the same time we hear nothing about the two Public
Protector's Reports on Julius Malema which found him to be a direct
beneficiary of numerous tender scams in Limpopo Province, from which he
fraudulently and unlawfully acquired money. Hence the same media, such as
the apartheid creation The Citizen which vilified Malema when he was a
member of the ANC is now putting him on the front page - a hero on the same
level as Verwoerd! And hence the right-wing, Imperialist Bloc of reactionary
parties in Parliament after seeing their EFF storm-troopers disrupt
parliament, have now wasted more valuable parliamentary time by bringing a
motion of "No Confidence" against speaker Baleka Mbete. Having no real
arguments that can make South Africa a better place, the Imperialist Bloc is
bent on making hooliganism in Parliament acceptable and making South Africa
a better place only for the richest 1% and their imperialist backers. 

 

>From the trivial arguments presented in Parliament on the failed motion of
no confidence it was obvious that they were attacking our constitution even
calling for an unelected person to be the Speaker of Parliament. 

 

Comrade Ian Beddowes is professional revolutionary and former MK
intelligence operative, writing in his personal capacity. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Umsebenzi Online" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, just send email to 
[email protected] 
For more options, archives, pages and files, visit the group web site at 
http://groups.google.com/group/umsebenzi-online?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Umsebenzi Online" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to