Tirsdag 04 desember 2007 12:57, skrev Juan Jose Pablos:
> Andreas Laub escribió:
> > And again, hello to all!
> >
> > And another Info:
> >
> > the used parted version has not ntfs support implemented yet. :-( So 
> > we

> > Anyone has a better solution???
>
> As far as I know that is actually implemented like that.
>

> hm,  before we went with parted 1.6.22, I remember getting a second 
> partition, but it was not formatted. So the first thing windows asked for 
> (when clicking on it in explorer) was if I would like to format it.

Yes, for that I've run a format.bat with the command format d: /q

> A newer parted version will probably create the ntfs partition, but it will 
> not be able to format it.

Another thing is that parted 1.6.22 couldn't create a extended partition with 
the mkpartfs switch. this only run with mkpart switch, which couldn't create a 
filesystem for the logical partition :-(

> Juan,
> should we go for the parted version Mario is using as a first step?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
unattended-devel mailing list
unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel

Reply via email to