Well... netboot is my next step. I do not see any problem getting that to work.
Currently the the floppy and the .iso build is a "single source" I just separated it out to make it easier to work with. In fact, just expand the two build environment to a single directory and you can build the floppy and the .iso from the same directory. edward On 04 Jul 2003 00:08:22 -0400, "Patrick J. LoPresti" wrote: > > One of our users (Edward Tak) has already done the legwork to get this > going. See: > > http://www.meanpenguin.com/ws-spi/unattend/ > > I have no objections to this approach, but it needs to be integrated > properly. That means preserving the "single source" for producing the > floppies, ISO images, and netboot image. And I am working on other > things right now, like automating the TXTSETUP.OEM stuff. > > I do wonder if this approach would solve the "floppyless laptop" > problem. Hm. > > New release this weekend, probably. > > - Pat > > Fidel Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just an idea. When it comes to booting why not cooperate with > > http://nu2.nu/ > > > > It is modular and it works like a charm both for static and DHCP. > > > > You can create profiles, support several NICs in one floppy and when it > > comes to bootable cd's options are unlimited. > > > > Just a thought. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > unattended-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
