I think this is a good idea.  (Actually, I think somebody sent patches
once, but I seem to have lost them...)

There are a couple of ways we can do it.

The easiest and most backwards-compatible way is to add a [_meta]
variable, like so:

    [_meta]
    toplevel_scripts="base.bat winxp.bat generic.bat"

...but have it default to the current list.

The other way is to do what you suggest, and move the toplevel scripts
to their own directory, say z:\scripts\top.  This is a clean design.
But it loses some backwards compatibility, and it makes it a little
harder for the scripts to refer to each other...

So I am leaning toward the [_meta] approach but am willing to be
talked out of it.

 - Pat

"Mark Harburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Rather than having this hard coded would it not be possible to
> generate them bassed on file name in a seprate folder, that way you
> can have like win2k.bat winxp.bat generic.bat without having to edit
> the source.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info

Reply via email to