Urs Rau wrote / skrev: > Now to the question, I could do with some arguments/facts/feedback or > shared experiences about some of you who have in the past undoubtedly > done it the "sysprep" way. Under win9x I had used "ghost" type imaging > very successfully and had no real issues, but "ghosting" w2k or higher > didn't work as flawlessly anymore. >
Without expereince, just reading through MS info on this. It is a lengthy process that involves a lot of steps to prepare this, you also need to redo the inventory-stuff whenever a new machine enters the organization, as well as if new hardware or software enters into the equation. That is, you need to start from the beginning. The "unattended" way, you just have to change the one specific thing that is changing in the setup-process. > So my question is twofold. First how frequent of an issue is it to have > to have two or three "perfect" images for the different HAL types? > (assuming that the MS documentation is right and one really does have to > have different images to be able to copy it to machines using different > HALs) As for the frequency, do a search at the MS-newsgroup, w2k.setup_deployment: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=sv&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment - Veronica Loell ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ unattended-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
